TraderVerdictCompare firms
TraderVerdict
Compare firms

FTMO vs Funding Pips

Side-by-side comparison across all 16 scoring variables. FTMO (83/100, Excellent) vs Funding Pips (76/100, Good).

FTMO
83
Excellent
Funding Pips
76
Good
Score Dimensions
Payout Integrity30%8.38.5
Rules Integrity22%8.07.7
Rules Stability8%8.08.5
Business Viability18%9.05.7
Platform & Execution9%8.56.5
Cost Fairness10%8.08.0
Specifications
Payout Split80% standard (90% after scaling plan)80% standard (90% after scaling)
Max Funded$200,000$400,000 (via scaling)
Payout CapNoneNone
Drawdown ModelStatic (max 10% from initial balance)Static max loss 8% from initial balance
Min Days43
Challenge FeeEUR 155–1,080~$450–$550 for $100K
Fee RefundableYes — refunded with first payoutYes — refunded with first payout
News TradingRestricted — 2-minute window before/after named events on funded account (evaluation: unrestricted)Restricted — window around major events on funded account (evaluation: unrestricted)
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeMT4, MT5, cTrader (select accounts)
Payout ScheduleOn demand (min 14 days after first trade)On demand; processed within 24–48 hours
Visit →Visit →

The Verdict

FTMO (83/100, Excellent) is the higher-scoring of the two on our composite. Its standout dimensions are score 83/100 (excellent) — payout track record is the longest in the prop firm space, with 11 years of operation and 42,000+ trustpilot reviews at 4.8/5.|static 10% max loss is the most forgiving drawdown model in the peer group; floor never moves with profit.|four platforms (mt4, mt5, ctrader, dxtrade) — broadest standard offering of any major prop firm, plus 20-language documentation.. Funding Pips (76/100, Good) is still worth considering if forex traders who want a challenger firm with competitive pricing and a static drawdown model, and who do not need a 10-year track record. See each firm's FTMO review and Funding Pips review for the full evidence.