TraderVerdictCompare firms
TraderVerdict
Compare firms

FTMO vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison across all 16 scoring variables. FTMO (83/100, Excellent) vs FXIFY (70/100, Good).

FTMO
83
Excellent
FXIFY
70
Good
Score Dimensions
Payout Integrity30%8.37.3
Rules Integrity22%8.06.0
Rules Stability8%8.08.0
Business Viability18%9.05.3
Platform & Execution9%8.57.5
Cost Fairness10%8.08.5
Specifications
Payout Split80% standard (90% after scaling plan)90% standard across all evaluation phases
Max Funded$200,000$400,000
Payout CapNoneNone
Drawdown ModelStatic (max 10% from initial balance)Balance-based with EOD updates; 3%/4%/5% daily by phase, 5%/8%/10% max by phase
Min Days4Plan-dependent; typically 3
Challenge FeeEUR 155–1,080From $39 minimum (small accounts); $50K two-step ~$300
Fee RefundableYes — refunded with first payoutYes — refunded with first payout
News TradingRestricted — 2-minute window before/after named events on funded account (evaluation: unrestricted)Restricted around major releases
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXTrade, TradingView
Payout ScheduleOn demand (min 14 days after first trade)Within-2-week cycle
Visit →Visit →

The Verdict

FTMO (83/100, Excellent) is the higher-scoring of the two on our composite. Its standout dimensions are score 83/100 (excellent) — payout track record is the longest in the prop firm space, with 11 years of operation and 42,000+ trustpilot reviews at 4.8/5.|static 10% max loss is the most forgiving drawdown model in the peer group; floor never moves with profit.|four platforms (mt4, mt5, ctrader, dxtrade) — broadest standard offering of any major prop firm, plus 20-language documentation.. FXIFY (70/100, Good) is still worth considering if forex traders outside north america who want platform optionality (mt4/mt5/ctrader/dxtrade/tradingview all available), a 90% headline split, and a refundable challenge fee. See each firm's FTMO review and FXIFY review for the full evidence.