TraderVerdictCompare firms
TraderVerdict
Compare firms

FTMO vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison across all 16 scoring variables. FTMO (83/100, Excellent) vs The Trading Pit (78/100, Good).

FTMO
83
Excellent
The Trading Pit
78
Good
Score Dimensions
Payout Integrity30%8.38.5
Rules Integrity22%8.07.7
Rules Stability8%8.09.0
Business Viability18%9.06.7
Platform & Execution9%8.56.5
Cost Fairness10%8.08.0
Specifications
Payout Split80% standard (90% after scaling plan)80% (scales with milestones)
Max Funded$200,000$160,000 (standard); higher via scaling
Payout CapNoneNone
Drawdown ModelStatic (max 10% from initial balance)Static max loss from initial balance
Min Days43
Challenge FeeEUR 155–1,080~$450–$550 for $100K (competitive)
Fee RefundableYes — refunded with first payoutYes — refunded with first payout
News TradingRestricted — 2-minute window before/after named events on funded account (evaluation: unrestricted)Restricted on funded accounts during named events (evaluation: unrestricted)
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeMT4, MT5, cTrader (select accounts)
Payout ScheduleOn demand (min 14 days after first trade)On demand; 1–3 business day processing
Visit →Visit →

The Verdict

FTMO (83/100, Excellent) is the higher-scoring of the two on our composite. Its standout dimensions are score 83/100 (excellent) — payout track record is the longest in the prop firm space, with 11 years of operation and 42,000+ trustpilot reviews at 4.8/5.|static 10% max loss is the most forgiving drawdown model in the peer group; floor never moves with profit.|four platforms (mt4, mt5, ctrader, dxtrade) — broadest standard offering of any major prop firm, plus 20-language documentation.. The Trading Pit (78/100, Good) is still worth considering if multi-asset traders who want to keep forex, futures, and stocks under one firm with a real path to a $5m account. See each firm's FTMO review and The Trading Pit review for the full evidence.