FundedNext vs Funding Pips
Side-by-side comparison across all 16 scoring variables. FundedNext (78/100, Good) vs Funding Pips (76/100, Good).
| — | FundedNext 78 Good | Funding Pips 76 Good |
|---|---|---|
| Score Dimensions | ||
| Payout Integrity30% | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Rules Integrity22% | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Rules Stability8% | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Business Viability18% | 7.0 | 5.7 |
| Platform & Execution9% | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Cost Fairness10% | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Specifications | ||
| Payout Split | 80% standard (90% after scaling plan) | 80% standard (90% after scaling) |
| Max Funded | $200,000 | $400,000 (via scaling) |
| Payout Cap | None | None |
| Drawdown Model | Static max loss 8% from initial balance | Static max loss 8% from initial balance |
| Min Days | 3 | 3 |
| Challenge Fee | $549 for $100K Stellar 2-Step | ~$450–$550 for $100K |
| Fee Refundable | Yes — refunded with first payout | Yes — refunded with first payout |
| News Trading | Restricted — 60-second window before/after named events on funded account (evaluation: unrestricted) | Restricted — window around major events on funded account (evaluation: unrestricted) |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader | MT4, MT5, cTrader (select accounts) |
| Payout Schedule | Bi-weekly cycle; on-demand after first payout | On demand; processed within 24–48 hours |
| Visit → | Visit → | |
The Verdict
FundedNext (78/100, Good) is the higher-scoring of the two on our composite. Its standout dimensions are score 78/100 (good) — fastest payout speed in the peer group, processing same-day to 24 hours after approval.|static 8% max loss with balance-based daily drawdown — the second-best drawdown model after ftmo.|multi-program flexibility (stellar 2-step, express, stellar lite) lets you match account type to strategy.. Funding Pips (76/100, Good) is still worth considering if forex traders who want a challenger firm with competitive pricing and a static drawdown model, and who do not need a 10-year track record. See each firm's FundedNext review and Funding Pips review for the full evidence.