Maven Trading vs Phidias Funding
Side-by-side comparison across all 16 scoring variables. Maven Trading (68/100, Good) vs Phidias Funding (67/100, Good).
| — | Maven Trading 68 Good | Phidias Funding 67 Good |
|---|---|---|
| Score Dimensions | ||
| Payout Integrity30% | 7.8 | 7.5 |
| Rules Integrity22% | 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Rules Stability8% | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Business Viability18% | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Platform & Execution9% | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Cost Fairness10% | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Specifications | ||
| Payout Split | 80% (standard) | 80% (stated) |
| Max Funded | $200,000 | $200,000 |
| Payout Cap | None | None stated |
| Drawdown Model | Static max loss from initial balance | Static max loss from initial balance |
| Min Days | 3 | 3 |
| Challenge Fee | ~$420–$500 for $100K (competitive) | ~$450–$530 for $100K |
| Fee Refundable | Yes — refunded with first payout | Stated — moderate confirmation |
| News Trading | Restricted on funded accounts (evaluation: unrestricted) | Restricted on funded accounts; specific windows not prominently disclosed |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Payout Schedule | On demand; 2–4 business day processing | On demand; 2–4 business day processing |
| Visit → | Visit → | |
The Verdict
Maven Trading (68/100, Good) is the higher-scoring of the two on our composite. Its standout dimensions are score 68/100 (good) — uk-based firm with multi-asset coverage including indices and commodities.|two-step evaluation with clear profit targets.|acceptable pricing relative to similar-tier firms.. Phidias Funding (67/100, Good) is still worth considering if forex traders who want a low-cost challenger firm and accept the trade-off of a shorter operational record. See each firm's Maven Trading review and Phidias Funding review for the full evidence.