Payout terms · Verified

Prop Firms With No Payout Cap

Firms that pay your full profit share every cycle — no monthly or per-payout ceiling. 16 firms verified no-cap from their payout policy, ranked by score. Firms that cap early payouts are excluded even when their headline reads “None.”

Ranked by score

Recommended
Prop firm
FTMO
80/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

FTMO

Prague, Czech Republic · Est. 2015

Payout Reliability7.9/10
Rule Fairness6.9/10
Rules Stability7.8/10
Business Viability9.0/10
Platform & Execution8.5/10
Cost & Value9.0/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Earn2Trade
80/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Earn2Trade

Houston, Texas, USA · Est. 2016

Payout Reliability7.7/10
Rule Fairness7.5/10
Rules Stability9.4/10
Business Viability8.6/10
Platform & Execution7.0/10
Cost & Value8.2/10
PromoTRADERVERDICT50% OFF + free eval after first payout
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Tradeify
78/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Tradeify

Florida, USA · Est. 2022

Payout Reliability8.5/10
Rule Fairness7.3/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability7.7/10
Platform & Execution7.5/10
Cost & Value6.2/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Funding Pips
78/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Funding Pips

Dubai, UAE · Est. 2022

Payout Reliability8.2/10
Rule Fairness7.8/10
Rules Stability8.2/10
Business Viability6.6/10
Platform & Execution7.0/10
Cost & Value8.0/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
The Trading Pit
77/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

The Trading Pit

Vienna, Austria · Est. 2021

Payout Reliability7.9/10
Rule Fairness7.3/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability7.3/10
Platform & Execution7.5/10
Cost & Value8.0/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Hola Prime
77/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Hola Prime

Mauritius (HQ); Hong Kong (operations); USA (presence) · Est. 2024

Payout Reliability8.4/10
Rule Fairness7.3/10
Rules Stability7.0/10
Business Viability7.1/10
Platform & Execution7.5/10
Cost & Value8.6/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Blue Guardian
76/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Blue Guardian

London, UK · Est. 2021

Payout Reliability7.9/10
Rule Fairness7.5/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability6.9/10
Platform & Execution7.0/10
Cost & Value7.4/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
OneUp Trader
76/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

OneUp Trader

Texas, USA · Est. 2017

Payout Reliability8.5/10
Rule Fairness6.1/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability7.9/10
Platform & Execution7.5/10
Cost & Value6.6/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
TradeDay
75/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

TradeDay

Chicago, Illinois, USA · Est. 2020

Payout Reliability8.0/10
Rule Fairness6.2/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability8.0/10
Platform & Execution8.0/10
Cost & Value6.8/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Lux Trading Firm
74/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Lux Trading Firm

London, UK · Est. 2020

Payout Reliability7.2/10
Rule Fairness7.8/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability6.9/10
Platform & Execution7.0/10
Cost & Value6.6/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Funded Trading Plus
74/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Funded Trading Plus

London, UK · Est. 2021

Payout Reliability7.7/10
Rule Fairness7.2/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability6.6/10
Platform & Execution6.5/10
Cost & Value7.0/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Alpha Capital Group
71/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Alpha Capital Group

London, UK · Est. 2020

Payout Reliability7.2/10
Rule Fairness6.7/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability6.6/10
Platform & Execution7.0/10
Cost & Value7.0/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
E8 Funding
70/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

E8 Funding

Wilmington, DE, USA · Est. 2021

Payout Reliability7.2/10
Rule Fairness6.8/10
Rules Stability8.2/10
Business Viability6.3/10
Platform & Execution6.5/10
Cost & Value7.0/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
Audacity Capital
69/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

Audacity Capital

Dubai, UAE · Est. 2019

Payout Reliability7.4/10
Rule Fairness5.9/10
Rules Stability8.8/10
Business Viability6.6/10
Platform & Execution6.5/10
Cost & Value6.2/10
See verdict
Recommended
Prop firm
FXIFY
68/100
StrongTVSM-PF/2.0.2

FXIFY

London, UK · Est. 2023

Payout Reliability6.8/10
Rule Fairness6.2/10
Rules Stability7.6/10
Business Viability5.7/10
Platform & Execution7.5/10
Cost & Value8.6/10
See verdict
Conditional
Prop firm
City Traders Imperium
62/100
AdequateTVSM-PF/2.0.2

City Traders Imperium

London, UK · Est. 2018

Payout Reliability6.3/10
Rule Fairness6.8/10
Rules Stability4.6/10
Business Viability5.8/10
Platform & Execution6.5/10
Cost & Value6.2/10
See verdict

No-cap firms at a glance

FirmTVSMProfit splitMax fundedPayout cap
FTMO79.980% standard (90% after scaling plan)$200,000No cap
Earn2Trade79.680/20 in trader favour across Live and LiveSim accountsTCP25 → $200K final account; TCP50/100 → $400KNo cap
Tradeify78.090% on sim-funded (Growth / Select / Lightning); 80% on Tradeify Elite live tier$150,000No cap
Funding Pips77.580% standard (90% after scaling)$400,000 (via scaling)No cap
The Trading Pit77.380% (scales with milestones)$160,000 (standard); higher via scalingNo cap
Hola Prime77.2Pro/Prime: 65% weekly / 80% bi-weekly / 95% monthly; Direct: 80% bi-weekly (90% upgrade)$4,000,000 via scaling planNo cap
Blue Guardian76.280% standard (scales to 85%+)$200,000No cap
OneUp Trader75.9100% of first $10,000 in profit, 90% thereafter$250,000No cap
TradeDay75.180% on first $50K profit, 90% on next $50K, 95% above $100K$150,000No cap
Lux Trading Firm73.975% base split (scales toward 80% on funded stages)$10,000,000 (via scaling)No cap
Funded Trading Plus73.580% (scales with milestones)$200,000No cap
Alpha Capital Group71.280% (scales to 85%+)$200,000No cap
E8 Funding70.080%$300,000 (via scaling)No cap
Audacity Capital68.650-90% by program (Funded Trader Program 50-60%; scaling program ~75%, up to 90%)$480,000 (via All In Program)No cap
FXIFY67.770-90% by program; ~80% standard (90% requires add-ons)$400,000No cap
City Traders Imperium61.880% (scales with milestones)$4,000,000 (via scaling)No cap

“No cap” means the firm's payout policy applies no monthly or per-payout ceiling on a standard account. Split and account-size values are the firm's standard tier; scaling plans may raise both. Derived from each firm's scored payout-cap evidence and re-verified monthly.

Why the cap matters more than the split

The cap is the real ceiling

A 90% split with a $2,500 per-payout cap pays a strong $10,000 month the same as a $2,778 month — the cap, not the split, governs what you take home. On a no-cap firm your withdrawal scales with your performance.

“None” isn't always none

Some firms headline “no cap” while capping your first several payouts at a fixed dollar amount, or capping the higher-risk account types. We score the actual policy, so those firms don't appear on this list.

Excess can be voided

On a minority of capped firms, profit above the cap isn't carried forward — it's forfeited. That turns a cap from an inconvenience into a direct loss of earned money. No-cap firms remove that risk entirely.

Still read the rest

No cap is one variable of seventeen. Minimum trading days, the consistency rule, the payout schedule, and the drawdown model all still apply. Open each firm's scorecard before you fund.

Payout cap FAQ

What is a prop firm payout cap?

A payout cap is the maximum you can withdraw in a single payout cycle (or per month) regardless of how much profit you actually made. For example, a firm may share 90% of your profits but cap each payout at $2,500 — so a $10,000 profit month still only pays out $2,500, with the rest delayed to future cycles or, on some firms, voided entirely. A no-cap firm pays your full earned share every cycle.

Which prop firms have no payout cap in 2026?

In our dataset, the firms with a verified no-cap payout policy include FTMO, Earn2Trade, Tradeify, Funding Pips, The Trading Pit, Hola Prime, Blue Guardian, OneUp Trader, TradeDay, and others — each ranked on this page by TVSM score. The list is derived from each firm’s scored payout-cap evidence and re-verified monthly.

How do you verify that a firm has no payout cap?

We read the firm’s own payout policy and score the payout-cap variable under TVSM-PF. A firm is listed here only when that evidence shows no binding cap on standard accounts — not when its marketing simply omits the cap. A firm whose documents are silent ("None stated") is not treated as a verified no-cap, and a firm that caps early payouts (e.g. a fixed dollar amount on your first four withdrawals) is excluded even if a headline reads "None".

Is a high profit split the same as no payout cap?

No — and conflating them is the most expensive mistake new funded traders make. A firm can advertise a 90% split and still cap each payout at $2,000–$3,000, which silently limits a strong month far more than the split does. Always read the split and the cap together: the split is the percentage you keep, the cap is the ceiling on how much of it you can actually take out per cycle.

Do no-cap firms still have other payout rules?

Yes. No payout cap does not mean no rules. Most firms still apply a minimum trading-day requirement, a minimum profit threshold before your first withdrawal, a consistency rule, and a payout schedule (e.g. on demand, bi-weekly, or per cycle). Read each firm’s full scorecard — the cap is one variable among seventeen.

How to verify a payout cap yourself

Read the firm's own payout policy or help-centre article, not its landing page — the cap is usually stated in the withdrawal terms. Each firm's scorecard on TraderVerdict links the exact payout-cap source we used. Cross-check the firm's regulatory standing against NFA BASIC and the FCA Register before funding any account.