Ranked by score
Funding Pips
The Trading Pit
Hola Prime
Blue Guardian
The5ers
Lux Trading Firm
Funded Trading Plus
Alpha Capital Group
E8 Funding
Audacity Capital
Phidias Funding
FXIFY
FundedNext
Maven Trading
Goat Funded Trader
City Traders Imperium
How each compares to FTMO
| Firm | TVSM | vs FTMO | Payout split | Drawdown model | Challenge fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTMOthis firm | 79.9 | — | 80% standard (90% after scaling plan) | Static (max 10% from initial balance) | EUR 155–1,080 |
| Funding Pips | 77.5 | −2.4 | 80% standard (90% after scaling) | Static max loss 8% from initial balance | ~$450–$550 for $100K |
| The Trading Pit | 77.3 | −2.6 | 80% (scales with milestones) | Static (Prime) or trailing (Classic) by account type; trailing locks at starting balance | ~$450–$550 for $100K (competitive) |
| Hola Prime | 77.2 | −2.7 | Pro/Prime: 65% weekly / 80% bi-weekly / 95% monthly; Direct: 80% bi-weekly (90% upgrade) | Balance-based with EOD updates; 3%/5%/3% daily, 6%/8%/5% max by program | From $48 (small accounts); $50K two-step ~$300 |
| Blue Guardian | 76.2 | −3.7 | 80% standard (scales to 85%+) | Static max loss 8% from initial balance | ~$500–$600 for $100K |
| The5ers | 75.5 | −4.4 | 80% (scales to higher tiers over time) | Static max loss from initial balance (never trailing) | ~$500–$700 for $100K Hyper program |
| Lux Trading Firm | 73.9 | −6.0 | 75% base split (scales toward 80% on funded stages) | Static max loss from initial balance | ~$650–$800 for $100K (above average) |
| Funded Trading Plus | 73.5 | −6.4 | 80% (scales with milestones) | Static max loss from initial balance | ~$480–$560 for $100K |
| Alpha Capital Group | 71.2 | −8.7 | 80% (scales to 85%+) | Static (10% from initial) or trailing high-water by plan; trailing locks at starting balance | ~$490–$580 for $100K |
| E8 Funding | 70.0 | −9.9 | 80% | End-of-day drawdown (no intraday trailing); locks static once threshold reached; 8% max by plan | $588 for $100K E8 Standard |
| Audacity Capital | 68.6 | −11.3 | 50-90% by program (Funded Trader Program 50-60%; scaling program ~75%, up to 90%) | Flexible loss limit (resets periodically); static variant available | ~$500–$600 for $100K |
| Phidias Funding | 68.5 | −11.4 | 80% (stated) | Static max loss from initial balance | ~$450–$530 for $100K |
| FXIFY | 67.7 | −12.2 | 70-90% by program; ~80% standard (90% requires add-ons) | Balance-based with EOD updates; 3%/4%/5% daily by phase, 5%/8%/10% max by phase | From $39 minimum (small accounts); $50K two-step ~$300 |
| FundedNext | 67.4 | −12.5 | 80% standard (90% after scaling plan) | Static max loss 8% from initial balance | $549 for $100K Stellar 2-Step |
| Maven Trading | 65.8 | −14.1 | 80% (standard) | Static max loss from initial balance | ~$420–$500 for $100K (competitive) |
| Goat Funded Trader | 64.1 | −15.8 | 80% (stated on standard accounts) | Trailing max loss (dynamic floor); EOD balance for daily | ~$400–$480 for $100K (competitive) |
| City Traders Imperium | 61.8 | −18.1 | 80% (scales with milestones) | Static max loss from initial balance | Competitive — varies by program type |
TVSM scores and the “vs FTMO” delta render live from each firm's current score — open a scorecard for the exact figure. Spec values are the firm's standard tier, quoted verbatim and re-verified when a firm changes its rules; scaling plans may differ.
Why look past FTMO
Recommended forex and CFD prop firms scored from their own rules, ranked against the firm most traders start with.
North America is the usual reason
FTMO’s published country rules keep US and Canadian residents out of its forex programs — that single restriction is why most people searching for an FTMO alternative are searching at all. Every firm on this page accepts traders FTMO will not, and each is scored from its own evaluation and funded-account rules, not its landing page.
Match the take-home, not the headline split
A high profit split means little if a payout cap throttles it. FTMO’s draw is a high split with no monthly cap, so an alternative only beats it on payout when it pairs a comparable split with an equally uncapped policy. Read the split and the cap together on each firm’s scorecard — the cap, not the split, governs what you actually withdraw.
The drawdown model travels with the trader
FTMO runs a static max-loss floor (the floor does not move), so banking profit never tightens your room. An alternative that uses an intraday-trailing floor (it follows your peak balance tick by tick) is a materially harder account to keep at the same dollar figure. Check the model before the price.
Instant funding versus the two-step
FTMO is a two-step evaluation. Several firms here fund in one step, or instantly for a higher fee — a different cost-and-risk trade, not a strictly better one. Run your plan through the Survival Calculator to see how the evaluation structure moves your odds before you pay a challenge fee.
FTMO alternatives FAQ
Why do traders look for FTMO alternatives?
The most common reason is geography: FTMO’s country rules exclude US and Canadian residents from its forex programs, so North American traders need another firm. The other reasons are rule-shopping — a cheaper challenge, a one-step or instant-funding path, or a payout policy that fits better. Every firm on this page is scored from its own published rules so you can compare like for like.
Which FTMO alternatives accept US and Canadian traders?
The firms on this list are filtered to recommended, scored forex and CFD firms; the ones that accept North American residents are marked on each scorecard via the verified country rules. Our Canadian hub at /prop-firms/canada filters the full roster to firms that accept Canadian residents specifically.
Do any FTMO alternatives offer a higher payout split?
Some do, and some pair a comparable split with no monthly cap, which is what actually matters for take-home. We don’t quote split numbers here because they change at rescore — the live, verified split and cap for each firm are on its scorecard. Compare the two together, never the split alone.
Are these FTMO alternatives regulated?
Prop firms themselves are generally not regulated as investment dealers — the trader-firm relationship is a contractor arrangement, not investment advice. What you can verify is the standing of the upstream broker and any parent entity against primary registers like the FCA Register and NFA BASIC, which we link below. The firm’s scorecard is where we keep the payout-integrity evidence.
More prop-firm shortlists
How to verify a firm before you fund
Read each firm's evaluation and funded-account rules, not its landing page — the drawdown model, daily-loss rule, and payout policy are in the risk-rule section. Every firm's scorecard on TraderVerdict links the exact sources we scored, and you can cross-check a firm's upstream broker or parent entity against the primary registers below. Test how a firm's rules change your odds in the Survival Calculator.